Key result
Nutritional rehabilitation linked to a ~116% increase in IGF-I levels.
Why the study?
Does IGF-I correlate with nutritional status changes in children undergoing nutritional rehabilitation for protein-energy malnutrition?
Cohort (n=59)
Yes
Does IGF-I correlate with nutritional status changes in children undergoing nutritional rehabilitation for protein-energy malnutrition?
Absolute Event Rate: 13.6% vs 6.3%
p-value: p=< .001
IGF-I levels increase during nutritional rehabilitation and correlate with anthropometric improvements, suggesting its utility as a biomarker for nutritional recovery in children with protein-energy malnutrition.
Objective. To investigate the relationship between IGF-I and the nutritional status of West-African children hospitalised for nutritional rehabilitation. Patients and methods. A cohort study was performed in two centres for nutritional rehabilitation and education (CREN) in Burkina Faso. Children were followed and the anthropometric data as well as the capillary blood samples were taken on the 7th and on the 14th days after their admission. IGF-I levels were determined from dried blood spots on filter paper on IGF-I RIA, after separation of the IGF-I from its binding proteins, using Sep-Pak chromatography. Results. A total of 59 children was included in the cohort. The IGF-I mean geometric values (SD) were 6.3 (1.4) mug/L on admission, 8.6 (1.8) mug/L at day 7 and 13.6 (2.0) mug/L at day 14. The differences between these values were statistically significant (P < .001). There is a significant correlation between the changes of IGF-I with the change of weight for height Z-score (P = .01). Conclusion. These results suggest that IGF-I can be considered as a potential marker to follow the nutritional status of children admitted in hospital for protein and energy malnutrition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kouanda et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Protein-energy malnutrition (n=59). Nutritional rehabilitation vs. Baseline (admission) was evaluated on IGF-I levels (p=< .001). Nutritional rehabilitation significantly increased IGF-I levels from 6.3 mug/L on admission to 13.6 mug/L at day 14 (P < .001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: