Key result
Periprostatic adipose tissue contact associates with increased prostate cancer aggressiveness markers and decreased epigenetic marks.
Why the study?
Periprostatic adipose tissue is likely to modulate prostate cancer progression, but variations in its effect according to fatty acid composition and tumor characteristics were not established.
Observational (n=59)
The effects of periprostatic adipose tissue on prostate cancer cells depend on tumor characteristics and adipose tissue lipid composition.
PPAT effects on PCa markers vary by composition and grade; leaves open nutritional targeting pending prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) is likely to modulate prostate cancer (PCa) progression. We analyzed the variations in the effect of PPAT on cancer cells, according to its fatty acid (FA) composition and tumor characteristics. METHODS: The expression of markers of aggressiveness Ki67 and Zeb1, and epigenetic marks that could be modified during PCa progression, was analyzed by immunohistochemistry on a tissue-micro-array containing 59 pT3 PCa, including intra-prostatic areas and extra-prostatic foci in contact with PPAT belonging to the same tumor. In addition, we cocultivated PC3 and LNCaP cell lines with PPAT, which were then analyzed for FA composition. RESULTS: Although the contact between PPAT and cancer cells led overall to an increase in Ki67 and Zeb1, and a decrease in the epigenetic marks 5MC, 5HMC, and H3K27ac, these effects were highly heterogeneous. Increased proliferation in extra-prostatic areas was associated with the international society of uropathology score. PC3 and LNCaP cocultures with PPAT led to increased Ki67, Zeb1 and H3K27me3, but only for PPAT associated with aggressive PCa. PC3 proliferation was correlated with high 20.2 n-6 and low 20.5n-3 in PPAT. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the effects of PPAT on cancer cells may depend on both PCa characteristics and PPAT composition, and could lead to propose nutritional supplementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cancel et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Prostate cancer (n=59). Periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) contact and fatty acid composition vs. Intra-prostatic areas (no contact with PPAT) was evaluated on Expression of markers of aggressiveness (Ki67, Zeb1) and epigenetic marks (5MC, 5HMC, H3K27ac). Contact between periprostatic adipose tissue and prostate cancer cells increased Ki67 and Zeb1 and decreased epigenetic marks, with effects depending on tumor characteristics and lipid composition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: