Key result
Mean IMT demonstrates better reproducibility than max IMT across equipment, operators, and readers.
Why the study?
The reproducibility of ultrasonic measurement of carotid artery intima-media thickness under study conditions for CHD prevention and treatment was evaluated.
Observational
Yes
Mean carotid IMT measurement is more reproducible than maximum IMT measurement, with reproducibility improving as more sites are measured.
May support preferring mean over max IMT for reproducibility; leaves open effects on risk prediction or outcomes.
Objective To evaluate the reproducibility of ultrasonic measurement of carotid artery intima-media thickness(IMT)under the study condition of the project of Establishment of an Integrated System for CHD Prevention and Treatment.Methods Ten subjects were scanned twice using 2 different type ultrasound systems(used by 2 field centers separately)to evaluate the inter equipment variability.Randomly selected 2 sonographers from each center attended the reproducibility test.Fifteen subjects were scanned twice by the sonographers independently to evaluate the intra and inter operator variability.Twenty image sequences were read twice by a single reader and once by an experienced reader to evaluate the intra and inter reader variability.All images were center read.Results The mean difference of mean IMT measurements of inter equipment,average intra and inter operator,and average intra and inter reader were (0.028±0.017)mm,(0.048±0.052)mm,(0.035±0.022)mm,(0.030±0.032)mm,and(0.081±0.043)mm,respectively,while the values of max IMT were(0.047±0.029)mm,(0.090±0.09)mm,(0.055±0.044)mm,(0.062±0.053)mm,and(0.085±0.050)mm.Conclusions Mean IMT measurement is more reproducible than max IMT.The more sites measured,the better reproducibiliby can achive.Comparing with published studies,the reproducibility of IMT measurement in our study is satisfied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2010) reported an observational. Ultrasonic measurement of carotid artery intima-media thickness was evaluated on Reproducibility (mean difference) of mean and max IMT measurements. Mean IMT measurement demonstrated better reproducibility than max IMT across different equipment, operators, and readers, with an inter-equipment mean difference of 0.028 mm for mean IMT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: