Key result
Patients with fibromuscular dysplasia and significant renal artery stenosis had a significantly lower renal resistive index (mean 0.51) compared to those without significant stenosis (mean 0.60), essential hypertension, and normotensive controls.
Why the study?
Data on the assessment of intrarenal blood flow parameters in patients with renal fibromuscular dysplasia were scarce.
How do intrarenal blood flow parameters differ between patients with renal FMD (with or without significant RAS), essential hypertension, and healthy controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=273)
Single-blind
Yes
How do intrarenal blood flow parameters differ between patients with renal FMD (with or without significant RAS), essential hypertension, and healthy controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.51% vs 0.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Intrarenal blood flow is preserved in patients with FMD and significant RAS, characterized by a lower renal resistive index compared to those without significant RAS, essential hypertension, or healthy controls.
INTRODUCTION Data on the assessment of intrarenal blood flow parameters in patients with renal fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) are scarce. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to evaluate intrarenal blood flow parameters in patients with FMD and significant or nonsignificant renal artery stenosis (RAS). PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated intrarenal blood flow parameters by Doppler ultrasonography in 153 patients with renal FMD enrolled in the ARCADIA‑POL study: 32 and 121 patients with and without significant RAS, respectively, compared with 60 matched patients with essential hypertension and 60 healthy controls. RESULTS Patients with FMD and significant RAS had a lower renal resistive index (RRI) compared with patients with FMD without significant RAS, patients with essential hypertension, and normotensive controls (mean [SD], 0.51 [0.08] vs 0.60 [0.07], 0.62 [0.06], and 0.61 [0.06], respectively; P <0.001). In patients with nonsignificant RAS, RRI correlated significantly with carotid intima-media thickness, 24‑hour diastolic blood pressure, 24‑hour pulse pressure, left ventricular diastolic function, known duration time of hypertension, and age. In patients with significant RAS, there was a significant correlation between RRI and known duration time of hypertension, left ventricular diastolic function, and age. In a separate, "per‑kidney" analysis, renal arteries with FMD and significant RAS were characterized by lower RRI values, higher maximal blood flow velocity, higher renal aortic ratio, and longer acceleration time compared with renal arteries with FMD and nonsignificant RAS as well as renal arteries without FMD. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to atherosclerotic RAS, intrarenal blood flow in patients with FMD and RAS is preserved, confirming that renal vasculature is relatively intact in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Januszewicz et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) with and without significant renal artery stenosis (n=273). Significant renal artery stenosis in FMD vs. FMD without significant renal artery stenosis, essential hypertension, and normotensive controls was evaluated on Renal resistive index (RRI) (p=<0.001). Patients with fibromuscular dysplasia and significant renal artery stenosis had a significantly lower renal resistive index (mean 0.51) compared to those without significant stenosis (mean 0.60), essential hypertension, and normotensive controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: