Key result
Ambulatory 24-hour SBP predicts future PWV whereas casual BP does not.
Why the study?
Does ambulatory blood pressure measurement improve prediction of future arterial stiffness compared to casual blood pressure measurement in previously healthy men?
Cohort (n=97)
Does ambulatory blood pressure measurement improve prediction of future arterial stiffness compared to casual blood pressure measurement in previously healthy men?
Ambulatory blood pressure measurement is superior to casual blood pressure measurement for predicting long-term future arterial stiffness in healthy men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ambulatory BP monitoring may refine long-term vascular risk assessment; leaves open whether targeting it slows arterial aging.
No prospective data have been published on whether ambulatory blood pressure (BP) works better than casual measurements in predicting arterial stiffness. This study with 11-year follow-up was launched to evaluate the usefulness of ambulatory intra-arterial BP in predicting pulse wave velocity (PWV). Ninety-seven previously healthy men were recruited from a routine physical check-up at baseline. BP was measured with standard cuff and intra-arterial ambulatory methods. Sixty-seven subjects with no antihypertensive medication were enrolled for a visit after a follow-up of 11 years. Arterial stiffness was estimated with PWV derived with impedance cardiography. Ambulatory 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP) (r = 0.30, P = 0.01), 24-h mean arterial pressure (r = 0.27, P = 0.03), 24-h pulse pressure (r = 0.27, P = 0.03) and daytime SBP (r = 0.26, P = 0.03) were the best BP variables in predicting future PWV. Casual BP values did not bear significant correlations with future PWV. In hierarchical regression analysis, the best predictive value for future PWV was achieved with the model including ambulatory 24-h SBP, smoking (number of cigarettes) and age (adjusted R(2) = 0.26). In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the only prospective follow-up study to show that ambulatory BP is superior to casual BP measurement in predicting future PWV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Virtanen et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Healthy (n=97). Ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure vs. Casual blood pressure measurements was evaluated on Pulse wave velocity (PWV) (r = 0.30, p=0.01). Ambulatory 24-hour systolic blood pressure significantly predicted future pulse wave velocity (r = 0.30, P = 0.01) over an 11-year follow-up, whereas casual blood pressure measurements did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: