Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: The impacts of prurigo nodularis (PN) on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs are unclear. METHODS: Plus) compared HCRU and costs over 1 year in adults with PN versus matched controls (region, payer type, age, sex, year) from 2016 to 2019, and also in patients with PN receiving advanced versus localized/no therapy. For patients with data in multiple calendar years, 1 year was randomly selected. Outcomes were compared by chi-square tests, t tests, or negative binomial tests. RESULTS: We matched 16,888 patients with PN with 16,888 controls. Most comorbidities (mental health, metabolic conditions, type 2 inflammatory diseases) appeared more frequently in patients with PN versus controls. HCRU was significantly (P < 0.001) higher for patients with PN versus controls, including mean (standard deviation, SD) number of outpatient visits (17.0 [15.5] vs 8.1 [10.7]) and proportion of patients with hospitalizations (9.3% vs 5.9%). Mean (SD) total costs were significantly (P < 0.001) greater for patients with PN versus controls ($18,315 [$66,476] vs $8451 [$30,982]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PN receiving advanced therapy had higher HCRU and costs versus localized/no therapy. Patients with PN (particularly those receiving advanced therapies) incurred higher all-cause HCRU burden and associated costs than matched controls. Enhanced feature (slides, video, animation) (MP4 12313 KB).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwatra et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: