Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
X-form is an unusual double helix of DNA adopted by poly(dA-dT) or (dT-dA)4 at high concentrations of CsF. On the other hand, poly(dA), poly(dT), (dA-dT)4 and most other DNAs do not adopt this conformer. Here we demonstrate that the X-form is strongly destabilized by GC pairs or even minute perturbations of the alternating pyrimidinepurine sequence. For example, the 30-mer d(TATAAT)5, containing five tandem repeats of the Pribnow box, fails to isomerize into the X-form. After (dT-dA)4, the 16-mer (dT-dA)8 is shown to be the second most predisposed oligodeoxynucleotide in the (dT-dA)n series to isomerize into the X-form while the duplex lengths corresponding to n = 3,5,6,7,9,12 and 20 make the X-form unstable even in the strictly alternating (dT-dA)n sequence. Consequently, the (dT-dA)n duplex length is also a crucial factor of the X-form stability on the oligodeoxynucleotide level. We discuss a possibility that the X-form is a solution counterpart of the D-form adopted in dehydrated poly(dA-dT) fibers because properties of these two conformers are remarkably similar in many respects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kypr et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: