Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 8, 2019Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Histological and histomorphometric analysis of bone tissue after guided bone regeneration with non‐resorbable membranes vs resorbable membranes and titanium mesh

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ACAlessandro CucchiMSMaria SartoriAPAnnapaola Parrilli

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Cucchi et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa941ec3c7019b2508aaa8dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12814
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review2008 · 444 citations
  2. 2Current barrier membranes: Titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications2013 · 533 citations
  3. 3Long‐term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation2001 · 322 citations
  4. 4Bone Level Variation After Vertical Ridge Augmentation: Resorbable Barriers Versus Titanium-Reinforced Barriers. A 6-Year Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial2014 · 54 citations
  5. 5Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with a Collagen Membrane and a Combination of Particulated Autogenous Bone and Anorganic Bovine Bone–Derived Mineral: A Prospective Case Series in 25 Patients2013 · 227 citations