Key result
GET-guided constant load exercise achieves full completion with a perceived exertion rating of ~12.
Why the study?
The gas exchange threshold is considered a safe training intensity for cardiac rehabilitation, but reports on its actual implementation are limited.
Does GET-guided constant load exercise provide an appropriate training intensity for older individuals during cardiac rehabilitation?
Does GET-guided constant load exercise provide an appropriate training intensity for older individuals during cardiac rehabilitation?
Constant load exercise at the gas exchange threshold provides an optimal and well-tolerated exercise intensity for older individuals undergoing cardiac rehabilitation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GET-guided constant-load exercise reached moderate intensity with full completion; leaves open efficacy versus other intensities in cardiac rehab.
The gas exchange threshold (GET), which is determined during incremental exercise (Inc-Ex) testing, is often considered a safe training intensity for cardiac rehabilitation. However, there are only a limited number of reports on the actual implementation of this method. We assessed the applicability of GET-guided exercise using a constant load exercise (CL-Ex) protocol.We recruited 20 healthy older individuals (healthy, age: 69.4 ± 6.8 years) and 10 patients with cardiovascular diseases or risk factors (patient, age: 73.0 ± 8.8 years). On day 1, we determined the GET during symptomatic maximal Inc-Ex. On day 2, CL-Ex at work rate (watt: W) where the GET manifested during Inc-Ex (therefore, not corrected for the known oxygen response delay) was maintained for 20 minute. Arterialized blood lactate (BLa) levels were also determined.Oxygen uptake reached a steady state in all participants, with a mean respiratory exchange ratio of < 1.0. The mean BLa at the GET during Inc-Ex was 1.51 ± .29 mmol·l-1 in the healthy group and 1.78 ± .42 mmol·L-1 in the patient group, which was about .5 mmol·L-1 above the resting level. During CL-Ex, BLa increased significantly over the value at the GET (Inc-Ex). However, it reached a steady-state level of 2.65 ± 1.56 (healthy) and 2.53 ± 0.95 (patient) mmol·L-1. The %peak oxygen uptake, %peak heart rate, and %heart rate reserve during CL-Ex were 58.8 ± 11.5, 71.8 ± 10.3, and 44.9 ± 17.4, respectively. All participants could complete CL-Ex with mean perceived exertion ratings (Borg/20) of 11.8 ± 1.3 (healthy) and 12.2 ± 1.3 (patient). These heart rate-related indices and exertion ratings were all within the recommended international guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation.CL-Ex at the GET appears to be the optimal exercise intensity for cardiac rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kominami et al. (2021) studied Cardiovascular diseases or risk factors (n=30). Constant load exercise (CL-Ex) guided by gas exchange threshold (GET) was evaluated on Applicability of GET-guided exercise (steady state oxygen uptake, blood lactate, and perceived exertion). Constant load exercise guided by the gas exchange threshold was successfully completed by all participants, with mean perceived exertion ratings of 11.8 (healthy) and 12.2 (patients).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: