Key result
Heart failure patients exhibit flat heart rate, unchanged stroke volume, and higher VE/VCO2 at peak exercise.
Why the study?
Different determinants of cardiopulmonary exercise response in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with mild or symptomatic chronic heart failure were not fully characterized.
How do cardiopulmonary and hemodynamic responses to exercise differ between patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, symptomatic heart failure, and healthy controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=28)
How do cardiopulmonary and hemodynamic responses to exercise differ between patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, symptomatic heart failure, and healthy controls?
Noninvasive monitoring with impedance cardiography and gas exchange reveals that symptomatic heart failure patients fail to augment stroke volume or decrease systemic vascular resistance during exercise, unlike asymptomatic patients with similar left ventricular dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May distinguish symptomatic HF from asymptomatic LVD via exercise hemodynamics; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
We investigated the upright bicycle exercise cardiopulmonary response in 20 patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD, secondary to previous myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction range 18-44%). Ten patients (48 +/- 7 years) asymptomatic (I NYHA class) without drug treatment (LVD group). The others (n = 10) (50 +/- 1 years) complained of dyspnea and/or fatigue despite therapy (NYHA II-III). They represented the heart failure (HF) group. Eight sedentary men (40 +/- 10 years) served as controls. Controls and patients performed stress testings under drug treatment, when administered. Anaerobic ventilatory threshold (ATge) was considered as an index of submaximal exercise while peak exercise VO2 (Peak VO2) was considered the maximal volitional exercise capacity. The ratio between minute ventilation (VE) to carbon dioxide release (VCO2) (VE/VCO2) was assessed to evaluate the ventilatory response during exercise. We coupled gas exchange assessment (2001, MGC) with noninvasive monitoring of stroke volume (SV) by impedance cardiography (NCCOM3, BOMED) and total systemic vascular resistances (TSVR; by auscultatory blood pressure measurement). In controls VO2 increase during exercise was related to higher heart rate (HR) and SV both from resting to ATge and from this point to the peak. TSVR declined during both steps. In patients with HF VO2 rose from resting to ATge (by faster HR and unchanged SV). VO2 increased slightly from this point to Peak VO2. This result was related to flat HR increase and unchanged SV as well as TSVR. In patients with LVD VO2 increased similarly to controls from resting to ATge and less above the threshold. In these patients both HR and SV increased during submaximal exercise. From ATge to Peak VO2 only HR increased. TSVR declined significantly similarly to controls. The VE/VCO2 ratio was higher at peak exercise in patients with HF compared to controls. Different determinants were demonstrated in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with mild or symptomatic chronic heart failure (CHF). These findings and the increased ventilatory response in patients with CHF can explain different changes of VO2 in these patients during submaximal and maximal voluntary exercise and contribute to explain exercise-induced exertion in these subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monteforte et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure (n=28). Left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure vs. Sedentary male controls was evaluated on Cardiopulmonary response including VO2, heart rate, stroke volume, and VE/VCO2 ratio. Patients with heart failure exhibited a flat heart rate increase, unchanged stroke volume, and higher VE/VCO2 ratio at peak exercise compared to controls during upright bicycle testing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: