Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Haemodiafiltration (HDF) provides better removal of middle-molecular-weight toxins, improving patient outcomes, including quality of life (QoL) and nutritional status, compared to standard haemodialysis. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of high-convection volume in HDF on QoL and nutritional status in patients undergoing twice-weekly HDF. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted amongst patients undergoing HDF from January to July 2024. HDF was performed twice-weekly. Data collected during dialysis included patient demographics, comorbidities, dialysis duration, body surface area and medical history. Length of time on HDF, laboratory measurements, dialysis-related data and episodes of infection and hospital admissions were noted. Results: Out of the 40 patients included, the majority ( n = 28, 70%) were men. The mean length of time on HDF was 39.6 months. The average haemoglobin level was 10.8 ± 1.5 g/dL. The target volume of ≥23 L per session for high-dose convection was achieved in 25 (62.5%) of delivered HDF sessions. The majority of patients from both groups were well nourished (effective convective volume [ECV] ≥23 L; n = 15 and ECV <23 L; n = 9). Overall health and sleep quality improved over 6 months, with no significant differences at 3 or 6 months. Patients with a shorter dialysis vintage (≤36 months) had slightly better health-related-QoL and sleep-related QoL scores. Conclusions: This study on dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease patients reveals that high-volume HDF with a convection volume of ≥23 L offers potential nutritional and QoL benefits, even though achieving optimal convection volume is challenging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhatia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: