Key result
A multi-biomarker combination was not statistically better than PlGF alone for predicting preeclampsia requiring delivery within 14 days in women at <35 weeks gestation (ROC 0.90 vs 0.87; P=.43).
Why the study?
The diagnostic utility of 47 biomarkers, alone or combined with PlGF, to determine the need for delivery within 14 days in suspected preterm preeclampsia was unclear.
Does a combination of biomarkers improve the prediction of preeclampsia requiring delivery within 14 days compared to PlGF alone in women with suspected preterm preeclampsia?
Observational (n=423)
Yes
Does a combination of biomarkers improve the prediction of preeclampsia requiring delivery within 14 days compared to PlGF alone in women with suspected preterm preeclampsia?
A single angiogenesis-related biomarker such as PlGF, sFlt-1, or endoglin alone is sufficient for diagnosing suspected preterm preeclampsia requiring delivery within 14 days, without the need for multi-marker panels.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PlGF alone may suffice for short-term preeclampsia prediction; leaves open whether multi-biomarker panels add value in other settings.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 47 biomarkers (selected from the current medical literature), in isolation or in combination with placental growth factor (PlGF), to determine the need for delivery within 14 days, in women presenting with suspected preterm preeclampsia. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter observational study, 47 biomarkers were measured in 423 women presenting with suspected preterm preeclampsia (in two prespecified groups: group 1 at less than 35 weeks of gestation and group 2 presenting between 35 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation) to evaluate their ability to determine the primary endpoint: preeclampsia requiring delivery within 14 days. Using factor analysis and stepwise logistic regression, we sought one or more additional biomarkers for optimal determination of the primary endpoint. RESULTS: In women presenting at less than 35 weeks of gestation (n=286), the best performing combination of PlGF, podocalyxin, endoglin, procalcitonin (receiver operating curve [ROC] area 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.93) was not statistically better than PlGF alone (ROC 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92; P=.43) for preeclampsia requiring delivery within 14 days. Two other single markers had test performance that was not significantly different to PlGF (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 [sFlt-1] ROC 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.88; endoglin ROC 0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.88). Similar findings were found in women presenting between 35 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation (n=137): ROC for PlGF alone 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.83); ROC for PlGF, cystatin, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A in combination 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.88; P=.40). CONCLUSION: This study supports the growing body of evidence that a single angiogenesis-related biomarker (PlGF, sFlt-1, or endoglin) alone represents a useful diagnostic test for women presenting with suspected preterm preeclampsia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duckworth et al. (2016) conducted an observational in suspected preterm preeclampsia (n=423). Multi-biomarker combination (PlGF, podocalyxin, endoglin, procalcitonin) vs. PlGF alone was evaluated on preeclampsia requiring delivery within 14 days (ROC 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.93, p=.43). A multi-biomarker combination was not statistically better than PlGF alone for predicting preeclampsia requiring delivery within 14 days in women at <35 weeks gestation (ROC 0.90 vs 0.87; P=.43).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: