Key result
Mobility caregivers and HR staff exhibit high anxiety reflected in altered HRV and degraded problem-solving.
Why the study?
During COVID-19 pandemic peaks, frontline healthcare professionals experience marked stress accumulation, especially caregivers in mobility and human resource teams managing mobility.
Does a 15-min testing procedure combining psychological questionnaires and HRV recordings identify degraded psychophysiological status among different groups of healthcare and administrative workers during a COVID-19 peak?
Cross-Sectional
Does a 15-min testing procedure combining psychological questionnaires and HRV recordings identify degraded psychophysiological status among different groups of healthcare and administrative workers during a COVID-19 peak?
Combining psychological questionnaires with HRV testing at the workplace can identify highly specific psychophysiological profiles and degraded problem-solving capacity in healthcare workers during crises.
May warrant stress support for mobility caregivers; hypothesis-generating for HRV monitoring in occupational anxiety.
During COVID-19 pandemic peaks, healthcare professionals are a frontline workforce that deals with death on an almost daily basis and experiences a marked increase in workload. Returning home is also associated with fear of contaminating or be contaminated. An obvious consequence is stress accumulation and associated risks, especially in caregivers in mobility and possibly in human resource teams managing mobility. Here, during the second pandemic peak, we designed a 15-min testing procedure at the workplace, combining HADS and Brief COPE questionnaires with heart rate variability (HRV) recordings to evaluate psychophysiological status in four groups: caregivers in mobility (MOB); human resources teams managing mobility (ADM); caregivers without mobility (N-MOB); and university researchers teaching online (RES). Anxiety, depression, coping strategies, vagally-mediated heart rate regulation, and nonlinear dynamics (entropy) in cardiac autonomic control were quantified. Anxiety reached remarkably high levels in both MOB and ADM, which was reflected in vagal and nonlinear HRV markers. ADM maintained a better problem-solving capacity. MOB and N-MOB exhibited degraded problem-solving capacity. Multivariate approaches show how combining psychological and physiological markers helps draw highly group-specific psychophysiological profiles. Entropy in HRV and problem-solving capacity were highly relevant for that. Combining HADS and Brief COPE questionnaires with HRV testing at the workplace may provide highly relevant cues to manage mobility during crises as well as prevent health risks, absenteeism, and more generally malfunction incidents at hospitals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deschodt‐Arsac et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Psychophysiological stress during COVID-19. Occupational role (caregivers in mobility, HR managing mobility, caregivers without mobility) vs. University researchers teaching online was evaluated on Psychophysiological status (anxiety, depression, coping strategies, HRV markers). Caregivers in mobility and human resources staff managing mobility exhibited remarkably high levels of anxiety, reflected in vagal and nonlinear HRV markers, with degraded problem-solving in caregivers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: