This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The masses of neutron-rich ¹⁰⁴⁻⁻¹⁰⁶Tc isotopes were measured using the JYFLTRAP double Penning trap and found to deviate from the Atomic Mass Evaluation 2020 by -79(25), 40(12), and 94(41) keV, respectively. In the case of 105,106Tc, the updated Q_β values are in agreement with a previous JYFLTRAP measurement, disagreeing with the values from the mass evaluation. The new mass values result in a more linear trend in two-neutron separation energies indicating that technetium ($Z=43$) isotopes around N≈60 are not a part of the island of shape coexistence around ¹⁰⁰Zr₆₀.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruotsalainen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: