The Ebola hemorrhagic fever outbreak inWest Africa poses acute and novel challenges for health policy and researchethics. Facedwith anexceptionally virulent in-fectious agent, limited resources, and danger to health workers, local and international authorities struggle to deployprovenpublichealth techniques thatcan limit the spread of the disease.1 In themidst of the crisis, experi-mental interventions thathaveneverbeenevaluated in human trials have captured professional and public at-tention. The prospect of first-in-human use of these in-terventions during an uncontrolled epidemic raises at least4pressingethical questions. First, is therea role for “compassionate use ” of agents in the absence of hu-man safety, efficacy, or dosing data? Second, given the critical scarcity of these agents, which patients should
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven Joffe (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: