Summary The thesis that Western Australia's forests are managed according to a set of biological principles is defended, both by enlarging on the evidence already presented and by providing additional evidence. A paper by Calver et al. (1996), critical of Abbott and Christensen (1994), is flawed factually and logically, and purports to justify with scientific data a personal ethical belief that forest management irrevocably damages the environment. They fail to address, with objective knowledge, the key issue of our 1994 paper: forests can be logged sustainably, i.e. while still retaining the species and processes of the forest ecosystem essentially intact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abbott et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: