This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: Chromosomal 1p/19q co-deletion is recognized as a diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarker in lower grade glioma (LGG). This study aims to construct a radiomics signature to noninvasively predict the 1p/19q co-deletion status in LGG. Methods: Ninety-six patients with pathology-confirmed LGG were retrospectively included and randomly assigned into training (n=78) and validation (n=18) dataset. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced T1 (3D-CE-T1)-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images and T2-weighted MR images were acquired, and simulated-conventional contrast-enhanced T1 (SC-CE-T1)-weighted images were generated. One hundred and seven shape, first-order and texture radiomics features were extracted from each imaging modality and selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator on the training dataset. A 3D-radiomics signature based on 3D-CE-T1 and T2-weighted features and a simulated-conventional (SC) radiomics signature based on SC-CE-T1 and T2-weighted features were established using random forest. The radiomics signatures were validated independently and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Tumors with IDH mutations were also separately assessed. Results: Four radiomics features were selected to construct the 3D-radiomics signature, and displayed accuracies of 0.897 and 0.833, areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of 0.940 and 0.889 in the training and validation datasets, respectively. The SC-radiomics signature was constructed with 4 features, but the AUC values were lower than that of the 3D signature. In the IDH-mutated subgroup, the 3D-radiomics signature presented AUCs of 0.950-1.000. Conclusions: The MRI-based radiomics signature can differentiate 1p/19q codeletion status in LGG with or without predetermined IDH status. 3D-CE-T1-weighted radiomics features are more favorable than SC-CE-T1-weighted features in the establishment of radiomics signatures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kong et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: