This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The generality of the findings reported by DeLeon, Iwata, and Roscoe (1997) was examined by conducting two stimulus-choice preference assessments, the second of which evaluated low-ranked items from the initial assessment. Results for the 2 participants suggested that supplementary assessments of low-ranked items may be useful for identifying a wider variety of reinforcing stimuli.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taravella et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: