Key result
Iloprost and N-acetylcysteine reduce muscle injury markers and preserve histopathology versus untreated ischemia-reperfusion in rats.
Why the study?
The effects of iloprost and N-acetylcysteine on ischemia-reperfusion injuries to skeletal muscle following acute abdominal aorta occlusion were not well defined.
Does iloprost or N-acetylcysteine reduce skeletal muscle injury in a rat model of acute aortic ischemia-reperfusion?
Does iloprost or N-acetylcysteine reduce skeletal muscle injury in a rat model of acute aortic ischemia-reperfusion?
p-value: p=<0.05
In a rat model of acute aortic ischemia-reperfusion, infusions of iloprost or N-acetylcysteine significantly reduced skeletal muscle injury markers and histopathological damage.
Hypothesis-generating in rat aortic ischemia-reperfusion; human trials required before clinical translation.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the effects of iloprost and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injuries to the gastrocnemius muscle, following the occlusion-reperfusion period in the abdominal aorta of rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four equal groups. Group 1: control group. Group 2 (IR): aorta was occluded. The clamp was removed after 1 hour of ischemia. Blood samples and muscle tissue specimens were collected following a 2-hour reperfusion period. Group 3 (IR + iloprost): during a 1-hour ischemia period, iloprost infusion was initiated from the jugular catheter. During a 2-hour reperfusion period, the iloprost infusion continued. Group 4 (IR + NAC): similar to the iloprost group. FINDINGS: The mean total oxidant status, CK, and LDH levels were highest in Group 2 and lowest in Group 1. The levels of these parameters in Group 3 and Group 4 were lower compared to Group 2 and higher compared to Group 1 (P < 0.05). The histopathological examination showed that Group 3 and Group 4, compared to Group 2, had preserved appearance with respect to hemorrhage, necrosis, loss of nuclei, infiltration, and similar parameters. CONCLUSION: Iloprost and NAC are effective against ischemia-reperfusion injury and decrease ischemia-related tissue injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiryakioğlu et al. (2015) studied Acute Aortic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury (n=40). Iloprost and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) vs. Ischemia-reperfusion without treatment and sham control was evaluated on Total oxidant status, CK, and LDH levels, and histopathological appearance (p=<0.05). Iloprost and N-acetylcysteine significantly reduced total oxidant status, CK, and LDH levels and preserved muscle histopathology compared to untreated ischemia-reperfusion in rats (P < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: