Key result
Mexiletine blocks cardiac rH1 sodium channels more potently than non-cardiac isoforms, partially via S251A.
Why the study?
Cardiac sodium channels have higher sensitivity to local anesthetics than other tissue sodium channels, but it was unclear if this applies to mexiletine and the molecular basis for this sensitivity.
The exaggerated sensitivity of cardiac sodium channels to mexiletine is mediated by specific amino acid residues, notably corresponding to the S251 position.
May inform cardiac-selective Na-channel blocker design; leaves open human translation from animal data.
Cardiac sodium channels have been shown to have a higher sensitivity to local anesthetic agents, such as lidocaine, than the sodium channels of other tissues. To examine if this is also true for mexiletine, we have systematically measured mexiletine sensitivity of the Na channel isoforms, rH1, (mu)1, and rBII, which were transiently expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. We confirmed that the cardiac isoform rH1 exhibited the highest sensitivity among the three tested channel isoforms. In rH1, (mu)1, and rBII, the respective IC(50) values were 62, 294, and 308 microM mexiletine, in regard to tonic block, and 18, 54, and 268 microM mexiletine, in relation to use (8 Hz)-dependent block. The relatively high drug sensitivity of rH1 was an invariant finding, irrespective of channel state or whether channels were subjected to infrequent or frequent depolarizing stimuli. Mutating specific amino acids in the skeletal muscle isoform (mu)1 (namely, (mu)1-I433V and (mu)1-S251A) to those of the cardiac isoform at putative binding sites for local anesthetic agents revealed that only one of the point mutations ((mu)1-S251A) has relevance to the high cardiac drug sensitivity, because mexiletine produced significantly more use-dependent and tonic block in (mu)1-S251A than wild-type (mu)1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawagoe et al. (2002) studied this question. Mexiletine vs. Other sodium channel isoforms (mu1, rBII) was evaluated on IC50 for tonic and use-dependent block. The cardiac sodium channel isoform rH1 exhibited higher sensitivity to mexiletine (IC50 62 microM for tonic block) compared to skeletal muscle and brain isoforms, partially due to the S251A residue.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: