PURPOSE: The preoperative differentiation of aseptic and septic loosening following a total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a challenging issue for clinicians to which several molecular imaging techniques have been applied. In our current study, we used F-18 fluoride positron emission tomography (PET) to evaluate THA cases with stable, septic or septic loosened implants to assess the possibility of differentiating these clinical settings using a novel uptake-type classification approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 65 joints were enrolled in this prospective study comprising 27 asymptomatic stable hips (control group), 11 painful hips conservatively treated after THA due to a suspicion of loosening, and 27 painful hips surgically treated after THA. PET imaging was classified into 3 types according to the uptake pattern. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was then measured for each joint. A final diagnosis was made via tissue examinations of surgically treated cases, and by serological and radiographic findings in conservatively treated cases. RESULTS: There were significant differences found between the SUVmax values for the aseptic and septic loosening THA cases. In the diagnosis of infection with type 3 pattern, the sensitivity and specificity were measured at 0.95 and 0.98 for all cases, and 0.95 and 0.88 for surgically treated cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our current study demonstrate that F-18 fluoride PET has considerable potential as a method for differentiating septic from aseptic loosening following a THA. The type classification of the uptake pattern can be performed relatively simply, and quantifications using the SUVmax values can then provide an objective evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: