Key result
Higher residual DOAC concentration is linked to lower total heparin requirements during AF ablation.
Why the study?
AF ablation with minimally interrupted DOACs may raise concerns regarding residual anticoagulant activity and its impact on intraprocedural heparinization.
Does the type and dose regimen of temporary interrupted DOACs affect residual anticoagulant activity and intraprocedural heparin requirement in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Observational (n=132)
Does the type and dose regimen of temporary interrupted DOACs affect residual anticoagulant activity and intraprocedural heparin requirement in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Effect estimate: β = -0.38
p-value: p=<0.001
Residual DOAC activity 24 hours after interruption varies by drug and dose, and independently determines the heparin requirement during AF ablation.
Residual DOAC activity was associated with heparin dosing in AF ablation; leaves open whether drug-specific interruption protocols optimize outcomes.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with minimally interrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may raise a concern about their remaining activity. We tested the residual activity of four different DOACs and its impact on intraprocedural heparinization in patients undergoing AF ablation. Methods We measured the anti‐factor Χa activity for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, and serum DOAC concentration for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, 24 hours after the last intake in patients undergoing AF ablation treated with standard or reduced doses of DOACs. The heparin requirement during the procedure was also measured. Results We enrolled 34 patients with rivaroxaban, 35 with apixaban, 32 with edoxaban, and 31 with dabigatran, and among them, 30 were treated with reduced doses. The anti‐factor Χa activity was the highest in the apixaban group among the patients with standard doses. The DOAC concentration was paradoxically lower in patients with standard doses than in those with reduced doses among the patients with rivaroxaban (34.3 ± 19.8 vs 56.6 ± 7.7 ng/mL; P = .01) and dabigatran (12.6 ± 10.6 vs 23.4 ± 14.7 ng/mL; P = .03). The total heparin requirement per body surface area had significant correlations with the anti‐factor Χa activity (r = −.36) and DOAC concentration (r = −.32). Two different multiple linear regression models (adjusted R2 = 0.56 and 0.6, respectively) revealed that the anti‐factor Χa activity (β = −.28; P = .002) and DOAC concentration (β = −.38; P < .001) were independent determinants of the total heparin requirement. Conclusions Factors determining residual DOAC activity may include its type and dose regimen, and it may influence the heparin requirement during AF ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sairaku et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=132). Direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran) vs. Comparisons across different DOAC types and dose regimens was evaluated on Total heparin requirement during the procedure (β = -0.38, p=<0.001). Residual DOAC concentration (β = -0.38; P<0.001) and anti-factor Xa activity (β = -0.28; P=0.002) were independent determinants of total heparin requirement during atrial fibrillation ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: