Why the study?
The effect of new oral anticoagulants on activated clotting time in response to heparin during AF ablation in Chinese populations was unknown.
Does uninterrupted dabigatran or rivaroxaban provide a more stable activated clotting time (ACT) response to heparin during catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does uninterrupted dabigatran or rivaroxaban provide a more stable activated clotting time (ACT) response to heparin during catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Uninterrupted rivaroxaban may provide a more stable and efficient ACT response to intraoperative heparin compared to dabigatran during AF ablation.
Rivaroxaban may yield more stable ACT than dabigatran in AF ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation before practice implications.
BACKGROUND: Uninterrupted use of oral anticoagulants before atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can reduce the incidence of perioperative thromboembolic events. However, the effect of new oral anticoagulants on activated clotting time (ACT) in response to heparin during AF ablation in Chinese populations remains unknown. The aim of the present retrospective study was to investigate the value of ACTs in response to intraoperative heparin administration in patients using dabigatran or rivaroxaban. METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2021, a total of 173 patients undergoing AF ablation were included in the study, in which 101 patients were treated with dabigatran, 72 patients were treated with rivaroxaban. The intraoperative ACT values were examined in both groups. The incidence of periprocedural complications was evaluated. RESULTS: < 0.05) as compared with the rivaroxaban group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of periprocedural complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The anticoagulant effect of uninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy appears to be more stable and efficient than dabigatran administration during catheter ablation in patients with AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: