Why the study?
It was unclear whether activated clotting time monitoring used during AF catheter ablation with UFH could be directly transposed from VKA to DOAC-treated patients.
Does the type of baseline anticoagulant affect activated clotting time (ACT) prolongation in response to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
Does the type of baseline anticoagulant affect activated clotting time (ACT) prolongation in response to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
Targeting an ACT of 300 s with UFH during AF ablation may lead to UFH overdosing and bleeding in patients on FXa-inhibitors (especially apixaban), as their ACT prolongation response is blunted compared to VKA or dabigatran.
May warrant FXa-specific ACT targets during AF ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is performed in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with intra-procedural unfractionated heparin (UFH) administration to achieve activated clotting time (ACT) at 300 s, as for vitamin K antagonist (VKA). We determined whether ACT monitoring might be transposed from VKA to DOAC-treated patients. Blood was taken from 124 patients receiving uninterrupted dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or VKA or being untreated. DOAC concentration or INR (VKA) were measured. ACT was determined at baseline, and after spiking with UFH doses equivalent to 1000, 2500, 5000 and 10000 IU in vivo. At baseline, anticoagulants prolonged ACT differently, ACT was longer with dabigatran and shorter with apixaban despite similar concentrations. ACT strongly correlated with INR and dabigatran concentration, but not with apixaban or rivaroxaban concentrations. Moreover, UFH effects on ACT prolongation depended on the anticoagulant: dose-response curves in samples with VKA and dabigatran were parallel whereas ACT prolongation in response to UFH was significantly smaller with rivaroxaban and especially apixaban. Therefore, UFH to achieve ACT at 300 s might be transposed from VKA to uninterrupted dabigatran-treated patients but not to patients receiving FXa-inhibitors, especially apixaban. Targeting 300 s might expose to UFH overdosing and bleeding, questioning the current anticoagulation strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: