Key result
Ciprofol 0.2 mg/kg minimizes hemodynamic impact vs etomidate during cardiac surgery induction, reducing norepinephrine use.
Why the study?
To evaluate the effects of different ciprofol doses on hemodynamics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Does ciprofol at different doses improve hemodynamic stability compared to etomidate during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
RCT (n=209)
Double-Blind
randomly divided
Does ciprofol at different doses improve hemodynamic stability compared to etomidate during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
p-value: p=<0.05
Ciprofol at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg provides stable hemodynamics and reduces the need for norepinephrine compared to etomidate during anesthesia induction for cardiac surgery.
May favor ciprofol 0.2 mg/kg for induction in cardiac surgery to limit vasopressor needs; extends RCT data versus etomidate.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of different ciprofol doses on hemodynamics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: 209 patients were randomly divided into four groups: 0.2 mg/kg etomidate group (group E, n = 50), 0.2 mg/kg, 0.3mg/kg, 0.4mg/kg ciprofol group (group A, n = 53, group B, n = 51, group C, n = 54). Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and bispectral index were recorded at the following time points: 5 minutes after entering the operating room (T 0 ); before anesthesia induction (T 1 ); immediately after induction (T 2 ); 1 minute and 2 minutes after induction (T 3 ~T 4 ); at intubation (T 5 ); 1 minute, 3 minutes, 5 minutes and 10 minutes after intubation (T 6 ~T 9 ); at skin incision (T 10 ). The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia and the doses of vasoactive drugs were recorded. Results: Compared with T 0 , HR, MAP, SV, CO all decreased to varying degrees after administration, and the decrease time in Group B and Group C were earlier than that in other two groups ( P < 0.05). SVR increased slowly after T 4 in all groups, but there was no significant differences ( P > 0.05). Compared with group E, the norepinephrine dose was significantly lower in groups A and B (both P < 0.05). Group C showed a greater decline in CO and SV than the other three groups from T 7 to T 10 ( P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference between groups A and E in CO and groups A, B, and E in SV ( P > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in MAP, SVR, and the incidences of hypotension and bradycardia among the four groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: 0.2 mg/kg ciprofol has the least impact on hemodynamics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and reduced norepinephrine use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in cardiac surgery (n=209). Ciprofol vs. 0.2 mg/kg etomidate was evaluated on Hemodynamics (MAP, HR, CO, SV, SVR) and incidence of hypotension and bradycardia (p=<0.05). Ciprofol at 0.2 mg/kg had the least impact on hemodynamics during anesthesia induction in cardiac surgery patients and significantly reduced norepinephrine use compared to etomidate (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: