This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Performing time history dynamic analysis using site-specific ground motion records according to the increasing interest in the performance-based earthquake engineering has encouraged studies related to site-specific Ground Motion Record (GMR) selection methods. This study addresses a ground motion record selection approach based on three different multi-objective optimization algorithms including Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO), Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm II (PESA-II). The method proposed in this paper selects records efficiently by matching dispersion and mean spectrum of the selected record set and target spectrums in a predefined period. Comparison between the results shows that NSGA II performs better than the other algorithms in the case of GMR selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaveh et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: