Key result
Severe obesity linked to ~44% lower VO2peak versus normal-weight adults.
Why the study?
The study sought to explore the characteristics of cardiopulmonary exercise capacity across adults with different degrees of obesity using CPET.
Does the degree of obesity affect cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=231)
No
Does the degree of obesity affect cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 13.6% vs 24.25%
p-value: p=<0.001
Increasing severity of obesity is associated with a progressive decline in maximum exercise capacity, peak oxygen consumption per kilogram, and breathing reserve.
May caution against over-attributing low peak VO2 to cardiac disease alone in obese adults; leaves open impact of weight loss on exercise capacity.
Objective To explore the characteristics of cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in adults with different degrees of obesity through cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Methods From September 2019 to January 2024, the data of patients undergoing CPET in the Rehabilitation Department of the Affiliated Wuxi People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 231 cases were included. They were categorized into five groups based on their body mass index (BMI): the control group (18.5 ≤ BMI < 24 kg/m 2 , n = 28), the overweight group (24.0 ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m 2 , n = 48), the mild obesity group (28 ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m 2 , n = 75), the moderate obesity group (35.0 ≤ BMI < 40 kg/m 2 , n = 47), and the severe obesity group (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 , n = 33). Collected informations on the age, gender, height, and weight of five groups of participants. The VO 2 at anaerobic threshold (VO 2AT ), percentage of predicted VO 2AT (VO 2AT % Pred), peak oxygen consumption (VO 2peak ), percentage of predicted VO 2peak (VO 2peak % Pred), peak kilogram oxygen consumption (VO 2peak /kg), maximum exercise power (WR max ), breathing reserve (BR), maximum heart rate (HR max ), percentage of predicted HR max (HR max % Pred), maximum O 2 pulse (VO 2 /HR max ), percentage of predicted maximum O 2 pulse (VO 2 /HR max %Pred), maximum relative O 2 pulse (VO 2 /HR max /kg),heart rate response (HRr), forced vital capacity (FVC), ratio of forced expiratory volume to vital capacity in 1 s (FEV1/FVC), percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (FVC% Pred), percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume ratio of 1 s (FEV1% Pred), peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), maximum exercise ventilation (VE max ), maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) and other indicators during the CPET were collected. Single factor analysis of variance was used to compare the mean of each index between groups. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between BMI and various indicators. Results There was no statistical significance in gender composition, age, height, and exercise habit of the five groups of participants (P > 0.05). The body mass and BMI of the five groups had significant differences (P < 0.001). In terms of cardiopulmonary exercise capacity, there were statistical differences among the five groups in the overall distribution of VO 2AT (H = 37.370,P < 0.001), VO 2AT /kg (H = 34.747, P < 0.001), VO 2peak (H = 23.018,P< 0.001), VO 2peak /kg (H = 66.606, P < 0.001) and WR max %Pred (H = 45.136, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference among the five groups in the overall distribution of VO 2AT %Pred, VO 2peak %Pred and WR max . There were statistical significant difference among the five groups in HR max (F = 2.443, P = 0.048), HR max %Pred (F = 6.920, P < 0.001), VO 2 /HR max (F = 8.803, P < 0.001), VO 2 /HR max %Pred (F = 11.354, P < 0.001), VO2/HRmax/kg (F = 18.688, P < 0.001) and BR (F = 6.147, P < 0.001) and HRr (F = 9.467, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among the five groups in RER max (F = 0.336, P > 0.05). In terms of static pulmonary function, there were significant differences among the five groups in FVC%Pred (F = 4.577, P = 0.001), FEV1%Pred (F = 3.681, P = 0.006) and FEV1/FVC (F = 3.344, P = 0.011). There was no differences among the five groups in MVV(P> 0.05), and there were significant differences among the five groups in VE max ( P = 0.005) In terms of correlation analysis, BMI was positively correlated with VO 2AT ,VO 2peak, VE max and VO 2 /HR max , and negatively correlated with VO 2AT /kg, VO 2peak /kg,WR max %Pred, HR max %Pred, VO 2 /HR max %Pred, VO 2 /HR max /kg,BR and HRr. In terms of static pulmonary function, BMI was negatively correlated with FVC%Pred, FEV1%Pred. Conclusion With the aggravation of obesity, the maximum exercise ability of adults decreases, VO 2peak /kg and VO 2 /HR max %Pred decreases, and the breathing reserve decreases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity (n=231). Increasing degrees of obesity (BMI) vs. Normal BMI (18.5 ≤ BMI < 24 kg/m2) was evaluated on Peak kilogram oxygen consumption (VO2peak/kg) (p=<0.001). Increasing degrees of obesity were associated with a significant decline in maximum exercise capacity, including a reduction in peak oxygen consumption from 24.25 ml/min/kg in normal-weight adults to 13.60 ml/min/kg in severely obese adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: