Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: We compared the bacteriological, pharmacological and histopathological effects of parenterally administered ciprofloxacin (CPFX) to those of imipenem/cilastatin (IMP/CS) and cefozopran (CZOP) in a murine model of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia mimicking ventilator-associated pneumonia. RESULTS: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CPFX, IMP and CZOP were 1.0, 1.0 and 4.0 mg/l, respectively. Treatment with CPFX resulted in a significant decrease in the number of viable bacteria [control, IMP/CS, CZOP and CPFX (mean +/- SEM): 5.02 +/- 0.20, 4.96 +/- 0.38, 5.44 +/- 0.13 and 3.27 +/- 0.02 log(10) colony-forming units lung, respectively]. Histopathological examination revealed that inflammatory changes in the CPFX-treated group were less marked than in other groups. Of the drugs analyzed, the pharmacokinetic parameters of area under the time-concentration curve (AUC)/MIC, AUC exceeding MIC and the time that lung concentrations of drug remained above the MIC were highest for CPFX. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that parenterally administered ciprofloxacin is effective in ventilator-associated P. aeruginosa pneumonia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaneko et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: