Key result
Cross-circulation VAB raises carotid PaO2 to ~151 mm Hg vs standard VAB in dogs.
Why the study?
A new cross-circulation venoarterial bypass technique was examined to address differential hypoxia during femoral VAB with oxygenation or PCPS.
Does cross-circulation venoarterial bypass improve upper body oxygenation in a canine model of respiratory failure compared to standard venoarterial bypass?
Does cross-circulation venoarterial bypass improve upper body oxygenation in a canine model of respiratory failure compared to standard venoarterial bypass?
A novel cross-circulation venoarterial bypass technique effectively resolves differential hypoxia in a canine model of respiratory failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating in canine respiratory failure; leaves open translation of cross-circulation bypass to human differential hypoxia.
We examined a new technique of cross-circulation (CC) venoarterial bypass (VAB) with femoral arterial perfusion and superior vena cava drainage through a long femoral venous cannula. Six adult mongrel dogs weighing 15 to 20 kg underwent the CC-VAB with oxygenation after introduction of respiratory failure (RF). The flow of the CC-VAB was maintained at half the level of the control cardiac output, and the hemodynamic parameters were monitored. To evaluate hypoxia in the upper body, the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2 [mm Hg]) in the carotid artery and the venous saturation of oxygen (SvO2 [%]) in the pulmonary artery were measured during control, RF, standard VAB, and CC-VAB conditions. The PaO2 decreased significantly after the introduction of RF (41.7 +/- 12.4), and it returned to normal levels only after CC-VAB (151.2 +/- 24.5, p < 0.05). The SvO2 during CC-VAB (98.6 +/- 2.1) was significantly higher than that during VAB without CC (53.5 +/- 3.4, p < 0.05). These results suggest that this cross-circulation technique could be applied to patients with differential hypoxia during femoral VAB with oxygenation or percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitamura et al. (1997) studied Respiratory failure with differential hypoxia (n=6). Cross-circulation (CC) venoarterial bypass (VAB) vs. Standard VAB and respiratory failure conditions was evaluated on Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) in the carotid artery and venous saturation of oxygen (SvO2) in the pulmonary artery (p=<0.05). Cross-circulation venoarterial bypass improved carotid artery PaO2 and pulmonary artery SvO2 compared to standard VAB in dogs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: