Key result
Neither third-degree AV block nor pre-hospital pacing is associated with survival in bradyasystolic OHCA.
Why the study?
The prevalence of AV conduction disorders and other bradyasystolic rhythms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is unknown, as is their impact on survival and potential benefit from pre-hospital pacing.
Does pre-hospital pacing improve survival to discharge in patients with bradyasystolic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Observational (n=2,333)
Does pre-hospital pacing improve survival to discharge in patients with bradyasystolic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Odds Ratio: 0.86 (95% CI 0.38–1.96)
In patients with bradyasystolic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, survival is extremely poor (1.9%) and pre-hospital pacing is rarely initiated, often delayed, and not associated with improved survival.
Prehospital pacing should not alter resuscitation practice in bradyasystolic OHCA; Level 3 data leave open whether earlier timing or selection improves outcomes.
AIMS: Bradyasystolic heart rhythms are often recorded in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders might lead to OHCA, but the prevalence of AV-conduction disorders and other bradyasystolic rhythms in OHCA is unknown. These patients might benefit from pre-hospital pacing. We aimed to determine the prevalence of different types of bradyasystolic heart rhythms in OHCA, including third degree AV-block, and document survival rates. METHODS: We used data from the ARREST-registry of OHCA in the Netherlands. Patients with bradyasystolic OHCA in 2006-2012 were included. ECGs were classified according to the presence of P-waves and QRS complexes in five rhythm groups. Differences in survival to discharge in relation to resuscitation characteristics, rhythm and pacing were tested using Chi-Square test and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: We included 2333 patients with a bradyasystolic rhythm; 371 patients (16%) presented with a third degree AV-block. In total 45 patients (1.9%, 95%-CI 1.4-2.5%) survived. A third degree AV-block (adjusted OR 0.86, 95%-CI 0.38-1.96) or pacing (adjusted OR 0.89, 95%-CI 0.21-3.78) was not associated with survival. Pacing was initiated in 110 patients (4.7%), after a long delay (median 18.7min). The strongest association with survival was found for the presence of a bradycardia (vs. asystole) (adjusted OR 4.20, 95%-CI 1.79-9.83), bystander witnessed (OR 4.13, 95%-CI 1.45-11.8) and EMS witnessed collapse (OR 5.18, 95%-CI 2.77-9.67). CONCLUSION: In bradyasystolic OHCA, 16% of all patients present with third degree AV-block, but survival for these and other bradyasystolic patients remains poor. Pacing is seldom initiated, often delayed, and rarely beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hulleman et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Bradyasystolic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n=2,333). Third degree AV-block vs. Other bradyasystolic rhythms was evaluated on Survival to discharge (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.38-1.96). In bradyasystolic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, neither third degree AV-block (adjusted OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.38-1.96) nor pacing (adjusted OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.21-3.78) were associated with survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: