Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To map the care-educational technologies for labor and delivery. METHOD: A scoping review, developed using the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The research question was formulated using the PCC strategy and its report described according to PRISMA-ScR. Searches were conducted in April 2025 in the Medline/Pubmed, Cochrane, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science databases and gray literature, without idiomatic and/or temporal restrictions. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included, identifying ten types of technologies, mainly aimed at preparing pregnant women and their companions for labor, reducing anxiety and strengthening autonomy, as well as supporting healthcare professionals in monitoring labor and making clinical decisions. CONCLUSION: Care-educational technologies are configured as strategies to support obstetric care, prepare pregnant women for labor, and improve professional practice during childbirth. Its use can contribute to safer, more participatory practices aligned with the humanization of childbirth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nour et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: