Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper solves the classical two-armed-bandit problem under the finite-memory constraint described below. Given are probability densitiesp_0andp_1, and two experimentsAandB. It is not known which density is associated with which experiment. Thus the experimental outcomeYof experimentAis as likely to be distributed according top_0as it is to be distributed according top_1. It is desired to sequentially choose an experiment to be performed on the basis of past observations according to the algorithmT_n = f(Tₙ₋₁, e_n, Y_n), e_n = e(Tₙ₋₁), whereT_n ∈ \{1, 2, ⋯, m\}is the state of memory at timen, e_n ∈ \{A, B\}is the choice of experiment, andY_n, is the random variable observation. The goal is to maximize the asymptotic proportionrof uses of the experiment associated with densityp_0. Letl(y) = p_0 (y) / p_1 (y), and letl̄and{l̄}denote the almost everywhere greatest lower bound and least upper bound onl(y). Let1 = max {{l̄}, 1/l̄}. Then the optimal value ofr, over allm-state algorithms(f, e), will be shown to belᵐ⁻¹ / (lᵐ⁻¹ + 1). Ane-optimal family ofm-state algorithms will be demonstrated. In general, optimal algorithms do not exist, ande-optimal algorithms require artificial randomization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cover et al. (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: