Key result
Oesophagectomy carries a ~26% unplanned 90-day readmission rate with risk factors distinct from gastrectomy.
Why the study?
Despite centralisation improving postoperative mortality after oesophagogastric cancer surgery, concerns persist regarding the management of complex complications at peripheral hospitals.
Does index readmission compared to non-index readmission improve survival in patients after oesophagectomy and gastrectomy?
Cohort (n=881)
No
Does index readmission compared to non-index readmission improve survival in patients after oesophagectomy and gastrectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 26.1% vs 24.2%
Complication-readmission patterns vary by procedure type, and the survival benefit of index readmission remains unclear after multivariable adjustment.
High readmission rates after oesophagectomy/gastrectomy warrant prevention efforts; leaves open whether index readmission improves survival.
BACKGROUND: Readmissions following oesophagogastric cancer surgery pose a substantial burden on healthcare systems and can adversely impact patient outcomes. While centralisation has improved postoperative mortality, concerns persist about the management of complex complications at peripheral hospitals. This study evaluates 90-day readmission rates following oesophagectomy and gastrectomy, distinguishing between index (hospital where primary surgery was performed) and non-index (peripheral hospital) readmissions. Secondary objectives include identifying risk factors for readmission and assessing the impact of readmission location on long-term survival. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre analysis was conducted on patients undergoing oesophagectomy or gastrectomy between 2011 and 2024. The primary outcome was unplanned readmission within 90 days of discharge. Multivariable logistic regression identified readmission risk factors. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Of 881 patients (571 oesophagectomy, 310 gastrectomy), readmission rates were 26.1 % and 24.2 %, respectively. Risk factors for readmission included non-severe anastomotic leaks (OR 2.93; P = 0.004) and severe complications (OR 2.19; P = 0.003) for oesophagectomy, and prolonged hospital stay for gastrectomy (OR 1.04; P < 0.001). Protective factors included severe respiratory complications (OR 0.48; P = 0.024) and severe complications in gastrectomy patients (OR 0.33; P = 0.036). Index readmission was associated with improved survival on univariable analysis only. CONCLUSION: Complication-readmission patterns vary by procedure type. While the survival benefit of index readmission remains unclear, our results highlight the importance of structured postoperative care to mitigate postoperative morbidity. Further research should identify complications best managed at tertiary centres to guide targeted readmission pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velayudham et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Oesophagogastric cancer (n=881). Oesophagectomy vs. Gastrectomy was evaluated on Unplanned readmission within 90 days of discharge. Unplanned 90-day readmission rates were 26.1% following oesophagectomy and 24.2% following gastrectomy, with risk factors varying by procedure type.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: