Key result
Intensive glycemic control reduced the incidence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy by 53% during the initial trial and by a third at 13 to 14 years of follow-up compared with conventional therapy.
Why the study?
Does intensive glycemic control prevent cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus?
Does intensive glycemic control prevent cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus?
Intensive glycemic control in diabetes provides long-term protection against cardiac autonomic neuropathy, supporting the concept of metabolic memory.
M etabolic memory, the concept that historical glycemic control is a major determinant of diabetes complications, is of considerable interest not only to those involved in the care of people with diabetes mellitus but also to a wider audience, those wishing to understand the pathogenesis of hyperglycemia-related target organ damage.2][3] An article in this issue of Circulation from the DCCT/EDIC Research Group demonstrates the same phenomenon for cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN). 4In the DCCT, intensive glycemic control over an average of 6.5 years achieved a marked reduction in hemoglobin A 1c , 1.7% lower than that achieved on conventional therapy, and a reduction in CAN incidence of 53%. 5 At the termination of DCCT, all participants were encouraged to adopt intensive glycemic control such that 5 years after DCCT termination, there was no significant difference in hemoglobin A 1c between the originally randomized groups.At 13 to 14 years of follow up, CAN incidence subsequent to DCCT termination in those initially randomized to intensive control was reduced by a third compared with those randomized to conventional therapy, even though glycemic control had been identical in these groups for decade before the CAN assessment.Statistical adjustment for historical glycemic control, specifically that achieved during the DCCT itself, abolished the group difference in CAN, supporting the assertion that metabolic memory explained the persistent lower risk of CAN in those originally randomized to intensive glycemic control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nish Chaturvedi (2009) conducted an editorial in Diabetes mellitus. Intensive glycemic control vs. Conventional therapy was evaluated on Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) incidence. Intensive glycemic control reduced the incidence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy by 53% during the initial trial and by a third at 13 to 14 years of follow-up compared with conventional therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: