Key result
Single-exon NGS deletion/duplication analysis identifies clinically significant variants in ~1% of cardiomyopathy patients.
Why the study?
The contribution of copy number variants to genetic cardiomyopathies has not been systematically studied despite reports of CNVs in various cardiomyopathy genes.
What is the diagnostic yield of single exon resolution NGS-based deletion/duplication analysis for 46 genes in individuals with genetic cardiomyopathies?
Observational (n=1,425)
What is the diagnostic yield of single exon resolution NGS-based deletion/duplication analysis for 46 genes in individuals with genetic cardiomyopathies?
The added diagnostic benefit of exon-level deletion/duplication analysis using NGS is very low (0.63%) for currently known cardiomyopathy genes, which may not justify the increased cost and complexity for routine testing.
Low CNV yield (0.63%) cautions against routine exon-level analysis in cardiomyopathy panels; leaves open targeted testing in select genes or subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic testing for genetic cardiomyopathies has undergone dramatic changes in the last decade with next generation sequencing (NGS) expanding the number of genes that can be interrogated simultaneously. Exon resolution copy number analysis is increasingly incorporated into routine diagnostic testing via cytogenomic arrays and more recently via NGS. While NGS is an attractive option for laboratories that have no access to array platforms, its higher false positive rate requires weighing the added cost incurred by orthogonal confirmation against the magnitude of the increase in diagnostic yield. Although copy number variants (CNVs) have been reported in various cardiomyopathy genes, their contribution has not been systematically studied. METHODS: We performed single exon resolution NGS-based deletion/duplication analysis for up to 46 cardiomyopathy genes in >1400 individuals with cardiomyopathies including HCM, DCM, ARVC, RCM, and LVNC. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Clinically significant deletions and duplications were identified in only 9 of 1425 (0.63%) individuals. The majority of those (6/9) represented intragenic events. We conclude that the added benefit of exon level deletion/duplication analysis is low for currently known cardiomyopathy genes and may not outweigh the increased cost and complexity of incorporating it into routine diagnostic testing for these disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ceyhan‐Birsoy et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Genetic cardiomyopathies (n=1,425). Single exon resolution NGS-based deletion/duplication analysis was evaluated on Clinically significant deletions and duplications. Single exon resolution NGS-based deletion/duplication analysis identified clinically significant deletions and duplications in only 0.63% (9 of 1425) of individuals with cardiomyopathies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: