Key result
Supine recovery reduces 10-minute excess post-exercise oxygen consumption by ~11% versus standing or leaning.
Why the study?
Discrepancies exist regarding which body position is optimal and practical for cardiopulmonary restoration and autonomic recovery following exercise.
Does the supine recovery position improve excess post-exercise oxygen consumption and heart rate recovery compared to trunk forward leaning or standing vertical positions in collegiate athletes?
Does the supine recovery position improve excess post-exercise oxygen consumption and heart rate recovery compared to trunk forward leaning or standing vertical positions in collegiate athletes?
Absolute Event Rate: 5246% vs 5878%
p-value: p=0.0099
The supine position optimizes 10-minute recovery post-submaximal exercise, while trunk forward leaning may be advantageous for short-term recovery.
May support supine recovery in athletes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: The body's anatomical position can influence the autonomic response to return to homeostasis following high intensity exercise. Discrepancies exist as to which body position is considered optimal and practical. This study intends to examine three recovery positions post submaximal exercise to determine which body position would be the most efficient in terms of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption and heart rate recovery. METHODS: NCAA Division I athletes (N.=17) from multiple sport teams completed three submaximal exercise tests utilizing the Bruce Protocol. Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption and heart rate recovery were measured at peak exercise and at 1-, 5-, and 10-minute time intervals during the recovery phase while assuming a recovery position: supine, trunk forward leaning, and standing vertical. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed the 1-minute excess post-exercise oxygen consumption associated with supine recovery (1725±348 mL/kg) was significantly greater than standing vertical (1578±340 mL/kg, P=0.024). At 5 minutes, supine excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (3557±760 mL/kg) was significantly less than trunk forward leaning (4054±777 mL/kg, P=0.0001) and trunk forward leaning was significantly greater than standing vertical (3776±700 mL/kg, P=0.008). At 10 minutes, supine excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (5246±961 mL/kg) was significantly less than both the standing vertical position (5878±1042 mL/kg, P=0.0099), and the trunk forward leaning position (6749±1223 mL/kg, P<0.0001). Supine had the highest heart rate recovery at 1-, 5-, and 10-minutes post exercise. CONCLUSIONS: The supine position proved to be the most optimal during the 10-minute recovery period, while the trunk forward leaning position showed to be a more advantageous position for short-term recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KUTAC et al. (2023) studied Post-submaximal exercise recovery (n=17). Supine recovery position vs. Trunk forward leaning and standing vertical positions was evaluated on Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption at 10 minutes (p=0.0099). Supine recovery resulted in significantly lower excess post-exercise oxygen consumption at 10 minutes (5246±961 mL/kg) compared to standing vertical (P=0.0099) and trunk forward leaning (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: