Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Design: Pretest–posttest. Objective: To determine the effect of 4 durations of static hamstring stretching on knee-extension passive range of motion (KE-PROM). Context: Effects of longer (90 and 120 seconds) static hamstring stretching on PROM have not been established relative to more typically recommended 30- or 60-second durations. Subjects: 35 healthy college-age subjects with >20° loss of KE-PROM. Outcome Measure: KE-PROM. Intervention: 5-week program of single daily stretch for 30, 60, 90, or 120 seconds. Results: Static stretching was effective in increasing KE-PROM regardless of stretch duration (P < .0001). A significant improvement was identified in mean PROM for each stretching group, but no difference existed among the 4 stretch-duration groups. The control group’s mean PROM decreased (mean = -3.2°, SD = 1.9), whereas each stretching group increased PROM (means 1.9° to 3.6°). Conclusions: Five weeks of daily static hamstring stretching for 30, 60, 90, or 120 seconds increase KE-PROM. Similar benefits were achieved regardless of stretch duration, suggesting that clinicians need not perform static hamstring stretches of more than 30 seconds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ford et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: