Background: Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome is a rare genetic tumor syndrome characterized by renal cell cancer, lung bullae, pneumothorax, and fibrofolliculoma. Patients with such orphan tumor disorders are at risk of not receiving a timely diagnosis. In the present, gender-sensitive study, we analyzed the delay between onset of symptoms and diagnosis of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Methods: mutation testing was performed in index patients and family members. Findings: The occurrence of the first symptom (fibrofolliculoma, pneumothorax or renal cell cancer) was rarely followed by a timely diagnosis of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome and did so significantly less often in female (1.3%) compared to male (11.4%) patients (chi-square 6.83, p-value 0.009). Only 17 out of 39 renal cell cancers (7/17 female, 10/22 male patients) were promptly recognized as a symptom of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Patients in which renal cell cancer was initially not recognized as a symptom of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome waited 9.7 years (females SD 9.2, range 1-29) and 8.8 years (males, SD 4.1, range 2-11) for their diagnosis, respectively. Four (three female, one male) patients developed renal cell cancer twice before the genetic tumor syndrome was diagnosed. The delay between fibrofolliculoma or pneumothorax as a first symptom and diagnosis of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome was considerable but not significantly different between females and males (18.1/17.19 versus 16.1/18.92 years). Furthermore, 73 patients were only diagnosed due to family history (delay 15.1 years in females and 17.4 years in males). Interpretation: The delay between onset of symptoms and diagnosis of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome can be substantial and gender-dependent, causing considerable health risks for patients and their families. It is therefore important to create more awareness of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome and resolve gender biases in diagnostic work-up. Funding: None declared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steinlein et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: