Key result
COVID-19 lockdown linked to a ~38% decrease in primary care chest pain consultations.
Why the study?
Cardiology departments reported declines in chest pain evaluations and ACS diagnoses during COVID-19 lockdown, but the pattern of chest pain in primary care was not yet clear.
Does the COVID-19 lockdown reduce chest pain consultations and ACS diagnoses in primary care patients?
Observational (n=9,908)
Yes
Does the COVID-19 lockdown reduce chest pain consultations and ACS diagnoses in primary care patients?
Relative Risk: 0.62 (95% CI 0.5–0.77)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.16% vs 7.55%
The COVID-19 lockdown led to a significant decrease in primary care chest pain consultations and registered ACS diagnoses, highlighting potential missed diagnoses or altered healthcare-seeking behavior.
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 lockdown had profound effects on society and healthcare. Cardiology departments reported declines in chest pain evaluations and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnoses. However, the pattern of chest pain in primary care is not clear yet. This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the number of patients presenting with chest pain in primary care. METHODS: Routine primary care data from the Extramural LUMC (Leiden University Medical Center) Academic Network (ELAN) in the Netherlands were used. Chest pain consultations from January 2017 to December 2020 were included. An interrupted time series analysis was performed to compare the incidence rate (IR) of chest pain consultations during the COVID-19 lockdown to the expected IR. Secondary outcomes were the type of consultations, referral proportions, and the IR of registered ACS diagnoses. RESULTS: In total 9,908 chest pain consultations were included. During the COVID-19 lockdown the IR was 6.16 per 1000 person-years while the expected IR was 7.55 (95% CI 7.03-8.12). The immediate effect of the lockdown yielded an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.62 (95% CI 0.50-0.77). A similar decrease was seen for ACS diagnoses (IRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.79), with no compensatory increase after the lockdown (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89-1.21). Face-to-face consultations shifted to telephone consultations (p < 0.001) and hospital referrals decreased (9.9% vs. 19.0% (p < 0.001)). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 lockdown the number of chest pain consultations and registered ACS diagnoses in primary care decreased significantly. In addition, fewer patients were assessed face-to-face and fewer patients were referred to the hospital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bulk et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Chest pain (n=9,908). COVID-19 lockdown vs. Expected incidence rate without lockdown (pre-lockdown period) was evaluated on Incidence rate of chest pain consultations (IRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.77). The COVID-19 lockdown was associated with a significant decrease in primary care chest pain consultations, yielding an incidence rate ratio of 0.62 compared to expected rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: