The question mark in the title indicates that what follows is not a theory explaining odor memory, but a series of findings that question the traditional view of memory, in which acquisition and retrieval of ‘memory items’ dominate all questions asked. That such questions arise in an area that deals with odors is not surprising. Odors are the least palpable and most evanescent of stimuli. Odors are not ‘ things’, unlike visual, auditory and tactile stimuli they do not have structured properties in space and/or time. Odors are notoriously hard to describe, classify and identify. We are surrounded by an almost infinite number of odors, although we usually do not pay attention to them. Our houses, our cities and we ourselves all smell different. We live amidst smells without noticing unless something happens that changes them. Lending your house or car to friends, a slight change in the flavor of your favorite marmalade are reminders that you have a good memory for odors that you could nevertheless not describe in any detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E.P. Köster (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: