Key result
Distinct autosomal dominant distal myopathy with early hand and leg involvement lacks known genetic linkage.
Observational (n=7)
Identifies a potentially novel autosomal dominant distal myopathy phenotype in a Finnish family, distinct from known loci.
Suggests a novel familial distal myopathy for clinicians to recognize; leaves open the causative locus and broader phenotypic spectrum.
OBJECTIVES: The authors carried out clinical, histopathologic, immunocytochemical, electrophysiologic, and imaging investigations and molecular genetic analysis in seven patients with distal myopathy belonging to a Finnish family. RESULTS: The disease showed autosomal dominant inheritance. Age at onset ranged from 32 to 45 years. The first symptoms for referral were clumsiness with the hands and frequent stumbling from a steppage gait. Muscle weakness was characterized by early involvement of the small muscles of the hands, gluteus medium, and both anterior and posterior muscle compartments of the legs. The disease progressed to involve other intrinsic muscles of the hands, as well as the forearm muscles, triceps and infraspinatus, and proximal lower limbs. Asymmetry of muscle involvement was common. EMG showed myopathic features, serum CK was normal or slightly elevated, and muscle biopsy showed many rimmed vacuoles and dystrophic changes. There was no evidence of linkage to Welander distal myopathy or tibial muscular dystrophy loci. CONCLUSION: These patients may have a distinct distal myopathy. Genome-wide scan is undertaken in order to identify the disease locus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahjneh et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Distal myopathy (n=7). Autosomal dominant distal myopathy was evaluated on Clinical, histopathologic, and genetic characteristics. Seven patients from a Finnish family exhibited a distinct autosomal dominant distal myopathy characterized by early hand and leg muscle involvement, with no linkage to known distal myopathy loci.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: