Key result
Normothermic circulatory arrest shows similar 30-day mortality but shorter cross-clamp times versus mild hypothermia.
Why the study?
Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is standard for acute type A aortic dissection repair, motivating evaluation of the feasibility and outcomes of normothermic circulatory arrest using antegrade cerebral perfusion as an alternative.
Does normothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion improve outcomes compared to mild hypothermia in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection?
Cohort (n=40)
No
Does normothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion improve outcomes compared to mild hypothermia in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection?
Absolute Event Rate: 5% vs 15%
p-value: p=0.6
Normothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion appears feasible and safe for acute type A aortic dissection repair, potentially reducing operative times and improving coagulation profiles compared to mild hypothermia.
Normothermic arrest with ACP appears feasible in type A dissection; leaves open superiority over deep hypothermia.
Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is the standard approach for the surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of normothermic circulatory arrest using antegrade cerebral perfusion as an alternative technique. A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis was conducted on patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between 2007 and 2023 at a single center. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent normothermic (>35°C) versus mild hypothermic (28–34°C) circulatory arrest. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, new neurological deficits, and the intraoperative and postoperative parameters. After propensity score matching, 20 pairs were analyzed. The normothermic group (NTCA) had significantly shorter aortic cross-clamp times (47.5 vs. 66.5 minutes, p = 0.013) and trends toward shorter cardiopulmonary bypass times (68 vs. 95 minutes, p = 0.066), ICU stays (4.5 vs. 5 days, p = 0.4), and intubation times (6 vs. 8 hours, p = 0.4). There were no significant differences in new neurological deficits (n = 6 [NTCA] vs. 4, p = 0.7), delirium (n = 5 [NTCA] vs. 6, p = 0.6), or mortality (n = 1 [NTCA] vs. 3, p = 0.6) between the groups. The normothermic group required less prothrombin complex concentrate (p = 0.0012). In this pilot study, NTCA with antegrade cerebral perfusion appears feasible and safe for hemiarch repair in acute type A aortic dissection, with potential benefits of shorter operative times and improved coagulation profiles compared with mild hypothermia. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rings et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute type A aortic dissection (n=40). Normothermic circulatory arrest (>35°C) with antegrade cerebral perfusion vs. Mild hypothermic (28-34°C) circulatory arrest was evaluated on 30-day mortality (p=0.6). Normothermic circulatory arrest showed similar 30-day mortality (5% vs 15%, p=0.6) and shorter aortic cross-clamp times (47.5 vs 66.5 min, p=0.013) compared to mild hypothermia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: