Key result
Combined FES and biofeedback improves functional independence and increases thigh muscle strength by ~1 point.
Why the study?
Stato-locomotor disorders are linked to poor quality of life and premature death after stroke, prompting evaluation of functional electrical stimulation and biofeedback stabilometric training on muscle strength and tone in chronic ischemic stroke.
Does functional electrical stimulation and biofeedback stabilometric training improve muscle strength and functional independence in patients with chronic ischemic stroke?
RCT (n=160)
Open-label
randomized
Does functional electrical stimulation and biofeedback stabilometric training improve muscle strength and functional independence in patients with chronic ischemic stroke?
p-value: p=<0.05
The use of biofeedback-based methods and functional electrical stimulation in medical rehabilitation improves motor functions and functional independence in patients with chronic ischemic stroke.
Supports incorporating FES with BFB-stability training into chronic stroke rehab; extends RCT evidence for strength gains in the chronic phase.
Relevance. Stato-locomotor disorders are associated with poor quality of life and risk of premature death in afterstroke patients. Aim. To evaluate the effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) and biofeedback (BFB) stabilometric training on muscle strength and muscle tone in the chronic period of ischemic stroke (IS) patients. Matherials and Methods. The 160 patients in the chronic period of IS were randomized into four equal groups (n=40) depending on the rehabilitation programm: 1 group of FES, 2 group using BFB-stabilometric training, 3 group of combined application of FES and BFB-stabilometric training, and 4 control group receiving the standard medical rehabilitation (MR). The follow-up period was 6 months. Muscle strength was assessed using the MRC scale, muscle tone – by the modified Ashworth scale, and patients' functional independence in daily life – by the Barthel index (BI). Results. Complex MR with the FES and BFB-stability training significantly (p <0.05) improved muscle strength: in the group with FES, thigh muscles – from 3.48±0.17 to 4.22±0.15 points (hip); in the group of FES and BFB-stability training – from 3.33±0.22 to 4.3±0.12 (hip) and from 3.18±0.14 to 3.52±0.12 points (shin). The positive statistically significant dynamics were determined by week 5 and 6 months of follow-up in groups 1 and 3 of patients and was associated with an improvement in functional independence according to the BI (p <0.05). Conclusions. The use of BFB-based methods in the MR process contributes to a recovery of motor functions and functional independence of the patient in the chronic stroke period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filippov et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Ischemic stroke (chronic period) (n=160). Functional electrical stimulation (FES) and biofeedback (BFB) stabilometric training vs. Standard medical rehabilitation was evaluated on Muscle strength (MRC scale) (p=<0.05). Combined functional electrical stimulation and biofeedback training significantly improved thigh muscle strength (from 3.33 to 4.3 points) and functional independence (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: