Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have investigated M···H−C interactions in d 8 square planar Rh and Pt complexes involving different types of C−H bonds, as well as a M···H−N hydrogen-bonded complex, using a combination of DFT and “atoms-in-molecules” (AIM) theory. The AIM analysis shows that both M···H−C and M···H−N interactions in d 8 square planar complexes are of a closed-shell, electrostatic nature, similar to protein backbone hydrogen bonds. However, at the shortest M···H distances, both interactions have partial covalence. We find no evidence for the involvement of d z 2 orbitals in M···H−C interactions but do find evidence for the involvement of d xz / yz orbitals in M···H−C bonding. The DFT calculations reproduce well the experimental proton NMR chemical shifts, with a theory-versus-experiment correlation coefficient R 2 = 0.985. There are large downfield 1 H NMR chemical shift changes on metal bonding, accompanied by changes in shielding tensor orientations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: