This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: Office-based steroid injection has shown promise for idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS). It is important to understand safety and patient-lived experience. We report patient experience related to airway restriction, voice, and side effects. Methods: Sixteen patients (51 ± 14 years) with mild-moderate (20-50%) stenosis undergoing office-based transnasal steroid injections were included; fourteen had prior operations. Patients typically underwent three injections, 1 month apart, followed by transnasal tracheoscopy 1 month later to evaluate outcome; number of injections can vary based on disease severity and response. Outcomes were Dyspnea Index (DI), Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnea scale, voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10), and degree of stenosis (estimated from procedural video). At each visit, patients were queried about post-injection airway restriction and side effects. Paired t-tests compared values at baseline versus follow-up tracheoscopy. Results: DI decreased ( t = 3.938, P = 0.0013), as did MMRC ( t = 2.179, P = 0.0457). There was no change in VHI-10 ( t = 1.354; P = 0.1957) scores. Airway stenosis decreased ( t = 4.331; P = 0.0006); this was not correlated with change in DI ( r = 0.267, P = 0.318). Side effects included airway restriction lasting <48 hours (n = 5), cough (n = 3), and nasal pain (n = 2). Conclusion: Steroid injections improved upper airway symptoms. Side effects were mild and transient. Improvement in DI did not correlate with percent stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoffman et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: