Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Variable fluorescence normalized to maximal fluorescence, F v /F m , determined by Fast Repetition Rate Fluorometry (FRRF) is being increasingly used to compare photosynthetic electron transport capacity in natural phytoplankton communities. Interpreting results of such studies is, however, complicated by the fact that both nutrient status and light history (photoinhibition under in situ conditions) are known to influence F v /F m . Thus, the value of F v /F m measurements in the field would be greatly enhanced if the light history signal could be separated from other influences. Here, both field and laboratory studies demonstrate that dark treatment (30 min‐4 h) before FRRF measurement is not sufficient to remove a light history signal in F v /F m . The signal could, however, be essentially eliminated by incubation of samples in low light prior to F v /F m determination. For the study conditions tested, the most effective treatment for removal of the signal was 4 h at 50 µmol m ‐2 s ‐1 . However, the effectiveness of the light treatment in removing the light history was influenced by temperature. Therefore, no universal protocol for eliminating the light history signal can be developed, but recommendations are given for developing site‐specific approaches for separating the light history signal from other factors influencing F v /F m . Carrying out light incubations before determining F v /F m not only provides the possibility for eliminating a light history signal in the measurements but the difference between F v /F m measured after light and dark incubations appears also to be a potentially useful indicator of the degree of photoinhibition experienced by phytoplankton under natural conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
From et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: