The field of nanomedicine has received much attention for its potential to allow for targeted identification and treatment of tumors, while sparing healthy tissue. This promise has yet to be clinically realized; instead nanomedicine has translated into clinical benefit via formulations that improve the pharmacokinetics and toxicity profiles of toxic chemotherapeutic agents. In this perspective, we highlight that several of the defining strategies for using nanoparticles intravenously to target solid tumors have limited supporting data in animal studies. Namely, it does not appear that reducing macrophage (and other cell type) uptake in vitro leads to better biodistribution in vivo, nor does increasing blood circulation time nor active targeting. We suggest instead that the coming decade will primarily see nanoparticles impact immunotherapy and local/pseudolocal cancer therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haute et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: