Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prescription and efficacy of daclatasvir and sofosbuvir ± ribavirin, including patient-reported outcomes, in routine practice in three European countries: the CMPASS-EU cohort study. Objectives: To identify patient characteristics associated with routine prescription of daclatasvir (DCV) in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and evaluate effectiveness, safety and quality-of-life (QoL) changes for DCV-based regimens. Methods: A prospective, observational cohort study in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands collected baseline data from all patients initiating a new HCV regimen, with 12-month follow-up of DCV-based treatments. Baseline predictors of prescription, longitudinal efficacy, and patient-reported QoL outcomes (EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and SF-36 global physical/mental health) on DCV were assessed. Results: Of 914 patients analyzed, 470 were prescribed DCV (469 with sofosbuvir [SOF] ± ribavirin [RBV]) and 444 non-DCV regimens. A high proportion prescribed DCV were cirrhotic (36%) and/or illicit drug users (IDU; 24%). Multivariate predictors of DCV treatment included genotype 3 infection (odds ratio 85.9 [95% confidence interval 43.5–170]), age ≥65 years (2.0 [1.2–3.3]), and cirrhosis (3.3 [2.0–5.3]). Sustained virologic response on DCV+SOF±RBV (observed) was 96–100% across subgroups of IDU, HIV co-infection, HCV genotype and cirrhosis status. Statistically significant improvements in all QoL outcomes were observed over 12 months of DCV+SOF±RBV irrespective of RBV use or cirrhosis status, but IDU had no change in SF-36 global mental health although other outcomes improved. Conclusions: In this cohort, DCV+SOF±RBV was efficacious for HCV treatment across a range of subgroups and associated with QoL improvements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bourgeois et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: