Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, the effects of adalimumab (ADA), a fully humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor α, on experimentally acute pancreatitis (AP) were examined. METHODS: Healthy Wistar rats (n = 32) were randomly divided into 4 groups: group 1, AP; group 2, AP + ADA; group 3, control (physiologic saline), and group 4, physiologic saline + ADA (n = 8/group). Acute pancreatitis was induced with a retrograde injection of 3% sodium (Na)-taurocholate into the common biliopancreatic duct. Adalimumab was simultaneously administered at 50 mg/kg intraperitoneally for groups 2 and 4. Physiologic saline was administered instead of Na-taurocholate for non-AP groups. After 24 hours, serum amylase, lactate dehydrogenase, pancreatic myeloperoxidase, and malondialdehyde activities, along with pancreatic histopathology, were examined. RESULTS: Adalimumab treatment significantly decreased serum amylase activity (AP, 2778.25 ± 298.80; AP + ADA, 2143.13 ± 221.69; control, 1541.00 ± 148.39; ADA, 1143.00 ± 256.30 U/L; P < 0.001), lactate dehydrogenase activity (AP, 2978.37 ± 364.65; AP + ADA, 2582.75 ± 164.23; control 931.25 ± 135.93; ADA, 582.62 ± 99.37 U/L; P < 0.001), myeloperoxidase activity (AP, 1.44 ± 0.20; AP + ADA, 0.86 ± 0.01; control, 0.60 ± 0.17; ADA, 0.41 ± 0.00 U/g of wet tissue; P < 0.001), malondialdehyde activity (AP, 16.94 ± 3.98; AP + ADA, 7.66 ± 2.27; control, 9.07 ± 1.00; ADA, 3.58 ± 0.30 nmol/g; P < 0.01), and total histopathologic scores (AP, 2.75 ± 0.16; AP + ADA, 1.50 ± 0.19; control, 0.00 ± 0.00; ADA, 0.00 ± 0.00; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the idea that adalimumab might be beneficial for severity of AP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yılmaz et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: