Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have studied the effects of Ti doping on the magnetic properties of MgB 2 superconducting bulks. The trapped field, which was obtained by field-cooled magnetization, B T FC , was about 3.6 T at 13 K at the surface of the single Ti5–20% doped MgB 2 bulks, which was about 1.3 times larger than that of the non-doped bulk. The B T FC of 4.6 T was achieved at 14.1 K in the centre of the doubly stacked Ti-doped MgB 2 bulks. The remanent magnetic flux density, which corresponds to the trapped field by zero-field cooled magnetization, B T ZFC , was comparable with the absolute value of coercive force with a very small vortex creep rate of about 2% over 40 h. These results suggested that the MgB 2 bulk was an excellent ‘quasi-permanent’ magnet. The critical current density, J c , under magnetic field was also enhanced by Ti doping; under 3 T at 20 K, the J c of 4.0 × 10 3 A cm −2 for the pristine sample was enhanced to that of 1.6–1.8 × 10 4 A cm −2 for the Ti-doped samples. The irreversibility field exceeded 5 T at 20 K for the Ti-doped samples. The existence of nanometric unreacted B and strongly Mg-deficient Mg-B particles and TiB 2 layers at the periphery of Ti precipitates was suggested in the Ti-doped bulks by microscopic observation. The improvement of the vortex pinning properties in Ti-doped MgB 2 originated from the creation of the nanometric nonsuperconducting particles and TiB 2 layers acting as strong vortex pinning centres.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naito et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: